JC Beyler
2018-11-21 03:38:30 UTC
Hi all,
Could I get a review for this small change for the except* tests:
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jcbeyler/8213721/webrev.00/
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8213721
The bug contains a good explanation of why this is required.
After the webrev, the tests no longer fail due to a SIGSEV with the flags:
-XX:+UnlockExperimentalVMOptions -XX:+EnableJVMCI -XX:+UseJVMCICompiler
-XX:+TraceExceptions -Dgraal.PrintCompilation=true -XX:+PrintCompilation
-XX:+TraceDeoptimization
(except010.java failed due to a timeout and except004.java failed due to
an OOME from a Graal thread).
Thanks,
Jc
Could I get a review for this small change for the except* tests:
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jcbeyler/8213721/webrev.00/
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8213721
The bug contains a good explanation of why this is required.
After the webrev, the tests no longer fail due to a SIGSEV with the flags:
-XX:+UnlockExperimentalVMOptions -XX:+EnableJVMCI -XX:+UseJVMCICompiler
-XX:+TraceExceptions -Dgraal.PrintCompilation=true -XX:+PrintCompilation
-XX:+TraceDeoptimization
(except010.java failed due to a timeout and except004.java failed due to
an OOME from a Graal thread).
Thanks,
Jc